
Background
The
Law section of the Mission Report, 2003, had explored the
domain of law and mental health, both at the level of legal
jurisprudence in this area, as well as the local context.
The strengths and limitations of the Gujarat judiciary
with respect to the mental health sector were pointed out.
Two large consultations were held of the legal officers
in the State of Gujarat to sensitive the juridiciary on
mental health, during the Mission Report work. The Mission
Report proposed that capacity building of the Judiciary
system in the State of Gujarat, was an important strategy
in strengthening the regulatory environment for mental
health.
As
a follow up of this, Bapu Trust, Pune, had proposed to
conduct 2 trainings in Gujarat, in collaboration with the
Judicial Academy, Gujarat, on “Law and Mental Health”.
Further meetings and discussions with the leadership of
the Judiciary (the State Legal Services Authority and the
Judicial Academy) led to the conviction that capacity building
had to be done at all levels of the judiciary, including
the judges, the public prosecutors, the district and metropolitan
judges, the legal aid lawyers and consultants. The law
teachers were also seen as a constituency to be trained.
In all 6 programs were proposed, including the law teachers.
Five programs were successfully completed at the end of
the project period in December 2005. The trainees have
included: Judges in Training (2 batches), Judges, including
District and Metropolitan Judges, Legal Aid Lawyers, Legal
Aid consultants, and Public Prosecutors.
This
report details a session by session description of the
trainings and evaluations done by the trainee legal officers.
Where there is repetition between training sessions, detailed
reporting has been curtailed.
Introduction
Under
the Auspices of the Executive Chair, Hon. Justice Dr. J.N.
Bhatt, Hon. Judge Jyotsna Yagnik, Member-Secretary, Offices
of the Gujarat State Legal Services Authority and Hon.
Justice Kadri of the Judicial Academy, Judges, Legal Aid
officers, consultants, Judges in Training, and Public Prosecutors
of the Judiciary of Gujarat were trained on the subject
of “Law and Mental Health” in the months from January to
December, 2005. Initially collaboration with the Judicial
Academy was proposed. But later the collaboration was formalised
through an offer letter with the Gujarat State Legal Services
Authority, Gujarat, due to the warm and enthusiastic and
open support of the program by the said Authority. The
program was inspired by the dynamic energies and synergies
of the Member Secretary, Legal Services Authority, Hon.
Judge Jyotsna Yagnik and Professor of Law, Amita Dhanda
(NALSAR).
The
training programs were conceived in order to fill a gap
in the Gujarat legal environment to better address the
needs of the restoration of rights and dignity of persons
with psychosocial disabilities, who are the most marginalized
in our society.
The
Legal Services Authority, Gujarat, has always been a dynamic
and activist institution, nurtured under the able leadership
of Hon Justice JN Bhatt and his associates. The Authority
is highly visible in the State, and we have noted with
admiration, that they can serve as a model for all other
states where the Authority is literally invisible. They
run a 24 hour service clinic, a mobile van and have extensive
coverage in rural areas, working directly with communities
and NGOs on legal awareness and legal redressal. Bapu was
proud to be working with this highly efficient and dynamic
government agency.
Bapu’s
perspective in training
Bapu
Trust has been involved in bringing about public visibility,
research and advocacy in the field of Law, ethics and mental
health. At the same time of doing these trainings, Bapu
is also simultaneously involved in engaging multiple stakeholders,
including psychiatrists in Gujarat, on developing the domain
of “Good practices in Mental health”. It is also involved
in doing two research studies on “Quality of care within
institutions”
and “Stakeholder perspectives in the mental health sector”.
A course on “Gender and mental health” was also conducted.
The
law and mental health trainings has to be looked at in
conjunction with Bapu’s overall work in Gujarat. The ground
level practice situation of legal officers was considered
in the training vis a vis the larger gender, cultural,
ethical and user related concerns in the mental health
sector.
Bapu
is also clearly committed to the privileging of certain
values in the sector (self determination of users, values
of liberty, justice and autonomy) over some other values
(safety, honour, wellness). The legal trainings is also
done at a time when the supreme court, the United Nations,
the World Health Organisation and various other law and
policy making authorities have accelerated their efforts
in the strengthening of the mental health sector.
Objectives
of our training:
We
aimed that each of our trainings would enable the participants
to:
- Appreciate
the scope and the role of the courts in determining the
course and lives of persons with psychosocial disabilities
- Be
informed about the enormous weight of law on persons
with psychosocial disabilities and be informed about
the evidence base in this area
- See
their own role as moral agents balancing different values
in the MH sector
- See
their own role as interpreters of the law in the interests
of persons with psycho-social disabilities
- Be
oriented to concepts and attitudes in dealing with persons
with psycho-social disabilities
- Examine
case law in the context of law, human rights and values
- Explore
the scope of law with respect to medical opinion and
legal capacity
- Have
an understanding of some current debates on the UN Disability
Convention
- Negotiate
the legal and interpretive spaces provided between the
Disability laws and the mental health laws in the country
Participants:
Judges
in training - 67
Judges (district, metropolitan, civil) – 34
Legal Aid Lawyers -47
Legal Aid consultants and public prosecutors - 32
Methodology:
Training
methodologies that the trainers believe in and profess
are mutual dialogue, debate and persuasion, methods that
expand the imaginative possibilities of the training group.
Evidence base was presented in the form of reading materials.
Case study, moot court and interactive methodologies were
used throughout. Challenges were posed by presenting hypothetical
situations for debate. Relevant and comprehensive books,
handouts and reading materials were given out. Lecture
presentations, Question Answer mode, open house methods
were also used. The trainings were consistently interactive,
with didactic methods serving to set the pace and tenor
for the interactive sessions. Since each training was with
a different type of legal officers, each program was tailored
to the needs of the training group.
Pilot:
As
this was the first time that such a series was being done
in India, the program was conducted in a self reflexive
way, as a pilot. The learnings for the trainers were also
consolidated in each session and appropriate changes made
for the next session. A set of curricular materials (essential
readings, handouts and case studies) was developed during
this period.
Press
meet and inaugurations
On
the 7th of January, a press conference was called at the
Clinic of the Gujarat State Legal Services Authority, where
around 30 members of the press (newspapers and TV) attended.
Hon Judge Jytosna Yagnik and Dr Bhargavi Davar conducted
the press conference. The details concerning the forthcoming
programs in the area of Law and Mental Health were announced
to the press. The local TV covered the evening’s event
and aired the news concerning the program the next evening.
Every
program was preceded by a formal inauguration, and ended
with a valedictory, as this gave us an opportunity to co-opt
members of the highest level of the judiciary in Gujarat
into the mental health movement. Our programs have been
inaugurated by Hon. Justice Mr JN Bhatt, Hon. Justice Kshitij
Vyas, Dr. Amarjit Singh (Health Commissioner, Gujarat),
Hon. Justice Jayant Patel, Hon. Justice Shetna, Hon. Justice
MR Shah, Hon. Justice DN Patel, Hon Justice BJ Shethana,
Shri Gautambhai Shah (renowned industrialist and Chairman,
Rotary International).
Inauguration,
8th January, 2005
The
entire program was inaugurated by Hon. Justice JN Bhatt,
under whose leadership this program was started. Mr JP
Dave’s book in Gujarati on the new laws for the layman
was released. Hon Judge, Member Secretary GSLSA, Mrs Jyotsna
Yagnik welcomed everybody, after Vandemataram. She termed
the program a “red letter day” in the history of the GSLSA
and the program as a “feather” in its cap. She introduced
the facilitators, Prof. Amita Dhanda and Dr. Bhargavi Davar,
and also Mr. JP Dave as an eminent and learned intellectual
in the field of law at the national level. Hon. Justice
Dr. JN Bhatt was introduced as the “Champion for the cause
of legal service”. He was the Chairman of GSLSA and served
as the Judge of Gujarat High Court. He was now being appointed
as the Chief Justice of the Patna High Court. He has compiled
the Treasures of Bhagavad Gita, and is also an eminent
and learned writer in international circles. The inaugural
lamp was lit by His Lordship and other members on the dais.
Hon.
Justice Bhatt released Mr JP Dave’s book. He introduced
his book as being useful for judges as well as lay persons,
and his wish was that it should reach every village, so
that the people will know the procedure, how to access
justice.
In
her inaugural speech, Prof. Amita Dhanda gave a few “Glimpses
of the forthcoming trainings” in Gujarat. In describing
the training program, Dr. Dhanda called it a mutual learning
process, where we shared experiences and knowledge.
She
talked about the interphase between law and mental health,
and the proactive role being played by the GSLSA in the
mental health sector and the need to strengthen the partnership
between law and mental health. This partnership, especially
the role of the judges and the courts, was important to
establish and protect the rights of persons with psychosocial
disabilities. The legislation provides the general principles,
but the administration of justice is an individualized
matter. The law gives a negative connotation to persons
with psychosocial disabilities, seeing them as dangerous
to themselves and to society. This stereotype should be
challenged. Single instances of dangerousness cannot be
viewed as representative of the constituency as a whole.
Further,
wherever courts determine “unsoundness of mind” a link
to capacity is made. The courts main role is seen as finding
a guardian for the person. We have to question whether
a diagnosis of mental illness automatically leads to canceling
capacity. The court does, in case law, appreciate the politics
of “insanity”. This appreciation should lead to further
critical engagement.
Prof
Dhanda emphasized the two points, one about the stereotypical
perceptions about the “mentally ill”, and the other, about
exclusion and discrimination, due to the determination
of
“unsoundness of mind”. She called for a paradigm shift, where
parity, participation, inclusion and empowerment are the
values determining the sector. She talked of their right
to make decisions, not just wise ones, but foolish ones too.
Afterall, learning is by trial and error, and making mistakes
and learning from that is any human being’s opportunity for
growth. Why do we set higher standards for persons with psychosocial
disability, when we say that they cannot decide, because
they will falter? Dr Dhanda outlined the design of the program
and talked about preparing a road map to make the justice
system address the needs of persons with psychosocial disability.
Hon.
Justice Bhatt in his key note address said that mental
health care in a country like India is in a very rudimentary
condition, compared to the western and European countries.
There is a wide canvas for us to begin work, the legal,
as well as the forensic. IPC Section 84 provided for the
acquittal of a person committing a crime in a state of
unsoundness of mind.
Justice
Bhatt referred to a distinction between pity and duty,
and talked about the duty to bring persons with a psychosocial
disability in the mainstream. Everywhere in the world,
including China and America, such persons were mainstreamed.
He emphasized the need to see this group as a vulnerable
group needing special protections from law. In doing case
work, he talked about the need to collect full and sufficient
history of the mental condition before analysis and pronouncements.
The
process of institutionalization shows that being a “mentally
ill” person is a type of punishment without doing any crime.
Old methods of treatments are required to be reviewed and
changed. We have to talk about de-institutionalization
and normalization, and about bringing the mentally ill
into the mainstream society. By the direction of the High
Court of Gujarat, no mentally ill person should be restrained
in the mental hospital. Also, force as a method of treatment,
should be stopped. He talked about the urgency to address
the needs of the 6% population of Gujarat, suffering from
a psychosocial disability.
Dr
Bhargavi Davar in her concluding remarks, talked about
care and treatment rights of people with psychosocial disabilities.
She cited the World Health Report, 2001, brought out by
the World Health Organisation, which gives staggering data
about the extent of the problem. She described the suffering
of people living forced lives within institutions, and
the poor standards of treatment and care. Mortality rate
among people living within institutions is high. The people
here also suffer from a high level of disability and forcefully
given shock treatments. There is also a growing dissatisfaction
among the users of mental health services leading to greater
litigation. She emphasized the need to develop a realm
of positive rights, where persons with psychosocial disabilities
are not excluded from society, enjoy full legal capacity
like others, hold jobs, and receive good quality and voluntary
mental health care. She talked about the need to foster
multi-disciplinary work in the sector, which will strengthen
voluntarism and user consent to treatment. The work of
the Gujarat Mental Health Mission and the Mental Health
Support Program was described.
Vote
of thanks was duly given after this.
Follow
up and future activities
As
the law teachers came within the University system, it
was decided that this activity would be taken up next year,
in collaboration with the University / law faculty in the
state of Gujarat as well as the Legal Services Authority.
Proposals have been received by the Gujarat State Legal
Services Authority from a local Law College to this effect.
The Gujarat State Legal Services Authority has offered
all co-operation necessary to sustain the program in the
long run. Some ideas suggested have been:
1.
Faculty training
2. Training of Trainers in Gujarat
3. Bringing out a training manual for the future
Since
this training, we have also received offers from other
State Judiciaries, notably Maharashtra and Andhra Pradesh,
where we can provide similar programs. We are very satisfied
that the pilot has proved to be an extremely challenging
and fruitful learning experience for us. There was also
a seamless and enriching quality to the collaboration with
the Gujarat State Legal Services Authority, and we have
learnt much from the dynamism of this department in terms
of working together.
Impact
of our work
- Establishment
of rapport and goodwill with the GSLSA and the promise
of future collaboration
- A
more informed judiciary on the topic of law and psychosocial
disability, at all levels of legal functions, though
the scope of the work is enormous and needs to be continued
- The
creation of a valuable set of curricular materials suited
to diverse groups of legal officers
- Inter-sectoral
good will and dialogue process established between the
health department and the judiciary through mutual exchanges
as key resource persons or chief guests in Bapu programs
in Gujarat
- Visits
by the legal officers including the Chief Justice of
Gujarat High Court to the Ahmedabad Mental Hospital and
creating awareness about the Legal Services Authority
to the patients through interaction and activities
- Creation
of a legal aid cell for persons with psychosocial disabilities
- Growth
of the trainers during the training process, in terms
of capacity to train this group of people, being clearly
sited in the practice needs of the training groups, and
working together in an easy, mutually supportive and
grounded manner
- Ideas
and plans for future trainings of this nature in other
States
Special
thanks to
- Hon
Justice JN Bhatt
- Member
Secretary, Hon Judge Jyotsna Yagnik for unconditional
warmth, love, hospitality and support throughout the
programs
- Project
officers, Mr PC Thaker and Mr SG Pathan, and all the
GSLSA staff for total involvement and support to our
programs
- All
the participants for the stimulating discussions
Co-ordinator
from the GSLSA, Hon Judge Jyotsna Yagnik
Hon.
Judge Yagnik worked as Principal in IM Nanavati Law College,
Ahmedabad, and was Prof in charge of PG Center in Law from
1998 – 99; has taught law subjects to diverse student groups
on various laws.
Was
appointed as conciliator and trainer for ADR in the Panel
of the International Center for ADR, New Delhi and has
served many years as conciliator and mediator in social
organizations, institutions and Lok Adalats; given talks
and lectures in many courses; also in the media
- Practiced
in Gujarat High Court, City Civil Court, Small Cause
Court, Criminal Courts, Rural Courts and various tribunals
from 1986 – 1999
- Conducted
many educational programs of the Lady Advocates Wing
(Gujarat) in the capacity of Secretary
- Was
City Civil and Additional Sessions Judge at City Civil
and Sessions Court, Ahmedabad; Secretary and Joint Secretary
of Ahd Bar Association for 5 years; Deputy Director,
Gujarat State Judicial Academy; presently Member Secretary,
Gujarat State Legal Services Authority, Ahmedabad
- Presently
working to finish a Ph. D. on the CEDAW
- Has
given many, many lectures and published academic papers
in national and international forums, on diverse topics
such as women and law, ADR, gender diversity, and has
been awarded the international award “UNO 2004”, for
excellence in Women, Empowerment and Human rights.
About
the course co-ordinator
- Prof.
Amita Dhanda, Ph. D., is a Professor and teacher of Law
in the law faculty of NALSAR
- Author
of Legal order / mental disorder, from Sage Publishers
and edited, written scholarly books and papers on various
topics relating to disability, psychosocial disability,
women and poverty.
- Member
of SC appointed committee for inquiry into the status
of mental and related custodial institutions in West
Bengal in the Sheela Barse case in 1989.
- Chairperson
of the National Amendment Committee (PWDA,1995) and authored
a report with recommendations pending before the Parliament.
- Founder
Trustee of Bapu Trust, Pune.
- India
Representative at the Ad Hoc Committee meetings of the
UN Convention of Disabilities, through Bapu Trust and
the World Network of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry.
- Well
known expert in the field of international and national
disability laws
About
the co-trainer
- Dr.
Bhargavi V Davar finished her Ph.D. from the Indian Institute
of Technology, Mumbai, in the field of the Philosophy
of Psychiatry.
- Researcher,
having published Psychoanalysis as a Human Science (1995),
Mental Health of Indian Women (1999) and edited Mental
health from a gender perspective (2001). Has published
in various peer reviewed journals and chapters of books
in the area of policy, gender, culture and mental health.
- Founder
and Managing Trustee of Bapu Trust, Pune; Director of
the Center for Advocacy in Mental Health, Pune; Advisory
to Seher, a mental health service program of Bapu Trust.
- Course
co-director of the Gender and Mental Health program of
the Bapu Trust and trainer in various Bapu Trust training
programs for government officers and civil society.
- Presently
involved in various research projects in social sciences,
culture, policy and mental health as principal investigator
at the Bapu Trust.
Further details of the reports may be obtained from our library
and documentation center. Details are given below:
Project
Title: Enabling Mental Health Environment in
Gujarat , 2003-2005
Draft
reports of
1. Trainings of Judges in Training, 8th and 9th January,
2005
2. Trainings of Judges in Training, 13th and 14th February,
2005
3. Trainings of Legal Aid Lawyers, July, 2nd and 3rd, 2005
4. Trainings of Judges, July 23rd and 24th, 2005
5. Trainings of Legal aid consultants and public prosecutors,
9th and 10th December, 2005
Course
Co-ordinator: Dr. Amita Dhanda, NALSAR, Hyderabad
Co-trainer: Dr. Bhargavi Davar, Bapu Trust,
Pune
In
collaboration with the Gujarat State Legal Services Authority,
Gujarat.
Venue: Old
High Court Building, Offices of the GSLSA, Gujarat.
Leadership: Hon. Justice Jyotsna Yagnik
Draft
report by Bhargavi Davar
Submitted
to : MHSP Co-ordinating office, Ahmedabad
December, 2005
Center
for Advocacy in Mental Health
a research centre of Bapu Trust
Kapil Villa, Plot no. 9
Survey No. 50/4, Kondhwa Khurd
Pune-411048
Tel: 020-26837644/47
Email: wamhc@dataone.in; info@camhindia.org
|